The blue-piller is unaware of the reality that surrounds him. Feminists and traditionalists control the discourse. The pick-up artist refutes the feminist and traditional discourse, but in PUA terms, his willy “controls the frame,” not his sovereign mind. He is not fully “red-pill.” He is defined and constrained by his pursuit of sex. A complete red-piller is either a man going his own way, a men’s advocate, or a human rights advocate.

What are ideas that are constructed of a mixture of observations of objective reality and Feminist Bullshit? It must also be Feminist Bullshit, or if it needs another name, to be treated, as Feminist Bullshit in the way that it is a useless product for discourse, except for the inspection and deconstruction of the Myth of Feminsm.

In Feminism Poisons Women: A Political Statement, Fidelbogen outlined a strategy to form a collective consciousness and internal dialog among non-feminist men and women. He stated that this consciousness would operate completely outside the Myth of Feminism. To that end, I propose that any who are interested should start a project to delineate all Feminist Bullshit in the public discourse. I will provide a definition of Feminist Bullshit here.

Feminst Bullshit: All vocal, written, and graphic rhetorical impulse applied to public discourse, individual interaction, and organizations from feminist advocates.

That is to say, if it is feminist lie, feminist half-lie, or predicated on either of these things, it is Feminist Bullshit. It can be said that the Myth of Feminism is the body of Feminist Bullshit.